In our Clear Choice Test, Virtual Server 2005 proved itself well worth the money because it lets you run multiple instances of Windows on the same machine. VMware (recently acquired by EMC) has long ...
Virtual Server 2005 R2, or "Release 2" in Microsoft's nomenclature, sports improved performance, support for failover in case of hardware failure, clustering of virtual machines on a single host or ...
Microsoft on Monday said it would remove the price tag from its Virtual Server and begin offering the virtualization technology as a free download to Windows users. Virtual Server 2005 R2 Enterprise ...
Virtual servers may make the utilization of physical servers more efficient, but that efficiency comes with a price. The physical servers that support VMs (virtual machines) have to be more powerful.
XDA Developers on MSN
Intel's N100 chip is entry-level, but it can run my entire home server
Despite its budget-friendly nature, the N100 is a lot more capable than it looks ...
Cordoning off physical servers from one another in a datacenter is difficult enough. Trying to isolate virtual servers running on a single hardware box is even more complicated. Mercy Medical Center ...
Who doesn't want more Power in their cloud? Today IBM announced a series of updates for its Power Virtual Server offering running on IBM Cloud. The new advancements to the onboarding and user ...
Virtualization may be the way to go for small to midsized firms. Instead of servers running at 10 percent or less capacity at certain points in the day, virtual servers can share hardware resources -- ...
Virtual Server 2005 creates virtual machines on top of the Windows 2003 Server operating system, instead of at the hardware level like many of its competitors. Hardware-level virtualization ensures ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results